restorative justice critiques and evaluation 1
All social theories and policies are subject to criticism, improvement, and change. In at least three scientific evaluation studies published in peer-reviewed journals or by government agencies (which must include methodology and references), find alternative points of view concerning the effectiveness of restorative justice and/or some of the critical issues facing the further development of restorative practices. In a well-written paper, discuss and evaluate two or three critiques of restorative justice. Also, predict future trends in restorative justice. In your discussion, consider the methods that researchers use to evaluate restorative justice programs, and include your critique of and suggestions regarding the methods used in these studies.
Your 2- to 3 full page paper should be formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements.
Cite at least three credible, outside sources in addition to the required readings. Peer-reviewed articles are often considered to be most credible. The CSU-Global Library is a good place to find these sources.
Plagiarism must not exceed 10%.